翻訳と辞書 |
R v Duarte ''R v Duarte'', () 1 S.C.R. 30, is a leading case decided by the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to privacy under section 8 of the ''Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms''. The Court held that warrantless and surreptitious video recording of private communications violates section 8. Consent of only one party to a conversation is insufficient to be reasonable. ==Background== Mario Duarte was under investigation by the police for drug-related offences. An undercover officer arranged a meeting with Duarte in a rented apartment room where the police had set up a video camera. Using the video evidence, Duarte was convicted. He appealed on the basis that he needed to give permission to record him. In a decision by Justice Peter Cory, the Ontario Court of Appeal found that the video camera did not violate the reasonable expectation of privacy as a camera was analogized to an extension of memory. He sees is as a "small step" beyond the use of human recall, and relied upon the older US cases of ''United States v. White'' and ''Lopez v. United States''.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Duarte」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|