翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ R v Cuerrier
・ R v Cunningham
・ R v Darrach
・ R v Daviault
・ R v Davidson
・ R v Davis
・ R v DB
・ R v Dear
・ R v Department of Trade and Industry, ex parte Broadcasting, Entertainment, Cinematographic and Theatre Union
・ R v Dersch
・ R v DeSousa
・ R v District Auditor No 3 Audit District of West Yorkshire MCC, ex p West Yorkshire MCC
・ R v Dixon
・ R v Drybones
・ R v Du Plessis
R v Duarte
・ R v Dudley and Stephens
・ R v Dyment
・ R v Dytham
・ R v Eastern Terminal Elevator Co
・ R v Edwards Books and Art Ltd
・ R v Evans
・ R v Ewanchuk
・ R v Faulkner
・ R v Fearon
・ R v Feeney
・ R v Finta
・ R v Forlee
・ R v G
・ R v George


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

R v Duarte : ウィキペディア英語版
R v Duarte
''R v Duarte'', () 1 S.C.R. 30, is a leading case decided by the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to privacy under section 8 of the ''Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms''. The Court held that warrantless and surreptitious video recording of private communications violates section 8. Consent of only one party to a conversation is insufficient to be reasonable.
==Background==
Mario Duarte was under investigation by the police for drug-related offences. An undercover officer arranged a meeting with Duarte in a rented apartment room where the police had set up a video camera. Using the video evidence, Duarte was convicted. He appealed on the basis that he needed to give permission to record him.
In a decision by Justice Peter Cory, the Ontario Court of Appeal found that the video camera did not violate the reasonable expectation of privacy as a camera was analogized to an extension of memory. He sees is as a "small step" beyond the use of human recall, and relied upon the older US cases of ''United States v. White'' and ''Lopez v. United States''.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「R v Duarte」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.